Finance, Hedge Fund, Latest, Quant, Stocks

Understanding Investment Returns: Arithmetic vs. Geometric

Investment returns, whether arithmetic for short-term or geometric for long-term compounding insights, serve as essential guides on successful investing.

5/5 (2)



Measuring investment returns lies at the heart of financial decision-making. Investors, whether individuals or institutions, allocate their capital to various asset classes with the expectation of generating returns.

Accurately assessing the performance of these investments is essential for several reasons. Firstly, it allows investors to track the progress of their portfolios, enabling them to make informed decisions about whether to buy, hold, or sell assets.

Secondly, it serves as a critical yardstick for evaluating the success of different investment strategies, helping investors identify which approaches yield the best results.

Furthermore, investment returns are often tied to specific financial goals, such as retirement planning or funding major life events, making it imperative to gauge whether those goals are being met.

Ultimately, measuring investment returns provides the essential data needed to gauge the effectiveness of financial decisions and steer portfolios toward financial success.

Investment Returns

Investors use different metrics to quantify investment performance, and two primary metrics are arithmetic returns and geometric returns. Each metric serves a distinct purpose and provides unique insights into an investment’s performance.

Arithmetic returns are straightforward and represent the average annual return over a given period. They are useful for quick assessments, especially for short-term investments.

In contrast, geometric returns, also known as the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), account for the compounding effect over time. This makes them a more accurate measure of long-term performance, as they provide an annualized growth rate that reflects how an investment would have grown if it had compounded at a constant rate annually.

Understanding the differences and applications of these two metrics is vital for investors seeking to make well-informed financial decisions, whether in the context of short-term trading or long-term wealth accumulation.

Arithmetic Returns

Arithmetic returns, also known as simple returns, are a fundamental method for measuring the average performance of an investment over a specific period. They offer a straightforward way to assess the average performance of an investment without accounting for the compounding effect.

The formula for calculating arithmetic returns is as follows:

Arithmetic Returns = Total Return for Each Period / Number of Periods

To calculate the arithmetic return, sum the returns for each period and divide by the number of periods. The result provides the average return for the specified time frame.

Pros and Cons of Arithmetic Returns


Simplicity: Arithmetic returns are easy to understand and calculate. They provide a quick snapshot of an investment’s performance over a given period.

Usefulness for Short-Term Analysis: Arithmetic returns are particularly useful when assessing short-term investments or comparing returns for different assets over a short horizon.


Doesn’t Account for Compounding: Arithmetic returns ignore the effects of compounding. As a result, they tend to overstate returns for longer holding periods, making them less accurate for long-term investment evaluations.

Misleading for Volatile Investments: Arithmetic returns can be misleading if an investment experiences significant fluctuations or volatility since they do not reflect the actual compounded growth or loss over time.

Inability to Measure Annualized Growth: Arithmetic returns cannot provide an annualized growth rate, which is essential for assessing long-term investment performance. This makes them less suitable for long-term financial planning and portfolio analysis.

Arithmetic returns are a simple and intuitive way to gauge investment performance over a specific period, but they have limitations when it comes to assessing the long-term effects of compounding and may not be suitable for highly volatile investments or long-term financial planning.

Geometric Returns (CAGR)

Geometric returns, also known as the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), provide a more precise measure of investment performance over time by accounting for the compounding effect. They are particularly valuable when assessing long-term investments where the value of an asset grows or declines at varying rates each year.

The formula for calculating geometric returns is as follows:

Geometric Return=(Vf​/Vi​​)^(1/n))​−1


  • Geometric Return represents the annualized growth rate.
  • Vi​ is the initial value of the investment.
  • Vf​ is the final value of the investment.
  • n is the number of years over which the investment has grown.

To calculate the geometric return, take the ratio of the final value to the initial value, raise it to the power of 1/n, and then subtract 1 from the result. This provides the annualized growth rate over the specified time frame.

Pros and Cons of Geometric Returns


Accounts for Compounding: Geometric returns accurately reflect the effect of compounding, making them a more suitable metric for long-term investment analysis.

Annualized Growth Rate: Geometric returns provide an annualized growth rate, which is crucial for comparing the performance of investments with different time horizons.

Realistic Performance Assessment: They provide a more realistic assessment of an investment’s growth or decline over time, especially in scenarios with varying returns.


Complexity: Calculating geometric returns can be more complex than arithmetic returns, requiring knowledge of logarithms and the use of financial calculators or software.

Less Useful for Short-Term Analysis: Geometric returns are less suitable for assessing short-term investments or making quick comparisons, as they may not provide meaningful results over very short time frames.

Potential for Misuse: If incorrectly used, geometric returns can misrepresent an investment’s performance, especially when applied to assets with erratic price movements.

Geometric returns, or CAGR, provide a more accurate measure of investment performance over time by considering compounding effects. They are particularly valuable for assessing long-term investments, but they are more complex to calculate than arithmetic returns and may not be suitable for short-term analysis or highly volatile assets.

Comparing Arithmetic and Geometric Returns

For example, calculate geometric and arithmetic returns as percentages for a five-year investment.

Suppose an investor invests $20,000 in a stock, and the value of the investment changes over a five-year period as follows:

Year 1: $22,000

Year 2: $21,500

Year 3: $23,500

Year 4: $25,000

Year 5: $27,000

Calculating Arithmetic Return (as a Percentage):

To calculate the arithmetic return as a percentage, use the formula:

Arithmetic Returns = Total Return for Each Period / Number of Periods

Arithmetic Return = (22,000+21,500+23,500+25,000+27,000)/5

Arithmetic Return = 119,000/5 = $23,800

Now, to express this as a percentage, calculate the percentage increase from the initial investment:

Percentage Arithmetic Return = ((23,800−20,000)/20,000)×100%=19%

So, the arithmetic return as a percentage is 19%.

Calculating Geometric Return (as a Percentage):

To calculate the geometric return or CAGR as a percentage using the same formula:

Geometric Return=(Vf​/Vi​​)^(1/n))​−1


  • Vi​ is the initial investment ($20,000).
  • Vf​ is the final value ($27,000).
  • n is the number of years (5).

Geometric Return=(27,000​/20,000)^(1/5))​−1

Geometric Return ≈ 0.1039 or 10.39%

In this example, the arithmetic return as a percentage is 19%, representing the average annual return over the five years. The geometric return as a percentage is approximately 10.39%, which accounts for the compounding effect and provides an annualized growth rate.

The geometric return is lower because it factors in the effect of compounding over time. Geometric returns, or CAGR, provide a more accurate measure of investment performance over time by considering compounding effects for long-term assets.

Practical Applications: How Investors and Analysts Utilize Both Metrics

Investors and financial analysts utilize both arithmetic and geometric returns, each serving specific purposes in investment analysis and decision-making. Here are practical applications of both metrics:

Arithmetic Returns:

Quick Performance Assessment: Investors often use arithmetic returns to get a rapid overview of an investment’s performance. When comparing several potential investments or monitoring short-term trading strategies, arithmetic returns provide a simple and immediate measure of success.

Asset Allocation: Asset managers use arithmetic returns to assess the performance of various asset classes within a portfolio. This helps in rebalancing the portfolio to maintain desired risk-return profiles.

Benchmarking: Arithmetic returns are crucial for benchmarking an investment against a relevant index or industry standard. Investors can quickly evaluate whether their investment has outperformed or underperformed compared to a chosen benchmark.

Geometric Returns (CAGR):

Long-Term Planning: Geometric returns, or Compound Annual Growth Rates (CAGRs), are indispensable for long-term financial planning. When saving for retirement, education, or other long-term goals, investors need to know how their investments will grow over time, factoring in the power of compounding. CAGRs provide this vital insight.

Investment Comparison: Analysts use CAGRs when comparing investment options with different time horizons. By annualizing returns, they can compare investments that have been held for varying periods, making it easier to assess which option offers the most attractive risk-adjusted returns.

Risk Management: Geometric returns help assess risk-adjusted returns, as they provide a consistent measure of performance that accounts for both gains and losses over time. Analysts use CAGRs to determine whether an investment’s return justifies its level of risk.

Case Studies:

1. Retirement Savings:

In a retirement planning case study, an investor compares two investment portfolios—one with an arithmetic return of 8% per year and another with a geometric return (CAGR) of 7% per year. While the arithmetic return may initially appear more favorable, the CAGR accurately reflects the annualized growth of the portfolio, accounting for the compounding effect. The investor realizes that the portfolio with the 7% CAGR will result in significantly higher wealth at retirement due to the compounding of returns over time.

2. Portfolio Rebalancing:

An asset manager is responsible for a diversified investment portfolio. To rebalance the portfolio and maintain the desired risk-return profile, the manager uses arithmetic returns to assess the performance of individual assets over the last quarter. Assets that have outperformed are trimmed, while those underperforming are increased. The manager also considers geometric returns when planning long-term portfolio changes, ensuring they align with the client’s financial goals.

3. Mutual Fund Analysis:

An analyst evaluates two mutual funds over a five-year period. Fund A has a high arithmetic return but is volatile, resulting in significant ups and downs. Fund B has a lower arithmetic return but consistently grows, leading to a higher geometric return. The analyst concludes that Fund B is better suited for risk-averse investors seeking stable long-term growth, whereas Fund A may attract more speculative investors comfortable with short-term fluctuations.

In these case studies, using both arithmetic and geometric returns showcases their roles in different aspects of investment analysis and decision-making. Arithmetic returns offer a quick snapshot, while geometric returns provide a deeper understanding of long-term performance and the power of compounding.

Please rate this

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *